We want to explore another avenue concerning the emails used in the factFREEH Fiction. This information needs forensic analysis from a qualified computer lab like the FBI's digital forensics and we are calling for the Feds to step in and do that analysis. If this email has been tampered with the State Government is too conflicted to do a competent and fair analysis since the Attorney General Linda Kelly has proven herself untrustworthy with her prosecution of Curley and Schultz and her blatant Lie in the Grand Jury Presentment.
This is Exhibit 2A - the very first Exhibit in the Freeh Report used to establish that Joe Paterno knew about the 1998 investigation and lied to the Grand Jury 13 years after the fact when he failed to recall any "additional allegations of criminal behavior" on the part of Jerry Sandusky
This is Exhibit 2A in the Freeh Report so you can go to this LINK and down to the Exhibits to prove this for yourself not using my images of the emails.
When you look at this email and use control + on your keyboard to blow it up you will see the large amounts of grey ghost like pixelation. Was this forged to add the Re: Joe Paterno subject line?
This email has no such pixelation around the text with the exception of the PERIOD following "Good Tom. Thanks for the update and I agree that we want to resolve this quickly ". PERIOD
This email is also from Gary Schultz's computer from Gary Schultz to Tom Harmon with a further email to Tim Curley at the bottom. So this is not about different computers or different email programs.
THIS EMAIL IS CAPTIONED RE: Jerry but Freeh says "coach (in these emails) is presumed to be Joe"
Blown up it looks like This
Note how clear the text appears with the sole exception of the final PERIOD at the very end of "quickly"
I agree that we want to resolve quickly. period - That isn't like the grammar used by Schultz and begs the question Was there something added to this sentence that was eliminated in order to make it appear Schultz was seeking a quick resolution when he was not?
Could Schultz have written "we want to resolve quickly only if the investigation is complete and in the best interest of the children of The Second Mile." "We don't want to leave any loose ends or put any child at risk." ?
Note how only the faintest pixelation occurs in the rest of the word - the jagged edges of diagonals and curves in the q u c k and y. The single dot of the period is clearly different.
Attorney General Kelly has been shown to have perpetrated a lie with her Grand Jury Presentment and Press Conference: So it is imperative this question be resolved by a Federal Investigator not subject to pressure from Kelly's office in Pennsylvania.
I just got off the phone with a former investigator for a Federal Agency who had a great deal of experience with computer documents back in 2000 and before. He believes these emails need to be put through a thorough analysis at the FBI's digital fraud lab where they could definitely determine if there is tampering as appears to him to be the case.
I have informed the investigators for Farrell and Roberto about our findings so anyone who is reading this should spread it around until someone in the local Harrisburg/State College media picks it up and takes it national - Sara Ganim are you there? If nothing else this provides enough information to launch and investigation of these emails and it cannot be done by Linda Kelly if you remember this:
The KEY thing to remember here is the Grand Jury Presentment on Nov 7th.and the Victim 2 section that contained a malicious bald faced LIE BY LINDA KELLY
An interesting point from my source. Some seem to be focusing on the clock inconsistencies in these emails and theorizing how one person's computer clock may have been off. To me this is not the issue. Exhibit 2b includes Joe Paterno's name in the RE: section when it appears out of place and in inconsistent font. The emails may have been edited with photo shop. To me this is the key issue to focus on. We know Freeh's crew laid the report out in a manner to stick it to the athletic department. The question is whether the emails once they were printed off the University server were doctored.
In anycase I cannot see why the University with their new proclaimed policy of transparency do not just release the original emails and employ a tech team to look at the emails in question and determine if they have been accessed or changed since 1998. After all these emails have been placed in the public domain. The clock issue is a valid issue. I am amused that the best defense people can come up with to explain the inconsistencies is to speculate that someone's computer clock must have been off. That is not really solid evidence to base 4 years of sanctions on.
CONTINUED AT BLOWING UP THE FREEH FICTION 2
Please pass this on to everyone and lets get these emails into the hands of Federal investigators
Barry Bozeman
THIS TOPIC IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION HERE ON OUR FORUM
